Renovating Housing Policy

mza_8623053361525323846.170x170-75The Grattan Institute was formed in 2008 as an ‘independent think tank’ intended to develop public policy for Australia. This week there has been a lot of media commentary about a publication by the institute addressing housing policy in Australia. Renovating Housing Policy was published on October 20th and states:

This report looks at our complex housing system as a whole. By quantifying the major government outlays on the private housing system, it reveals the cumulative impact of housing policies both on individual choices of where and how to live, and on productivity and inequality in our cities.

The initial part of the report examines some fascinating trends and demographics related to home ownership in Australia, there is interesting data presented on the change in home ownership rates over the last 100 years as well as examination of current ownership rates by age as well as earnings. It then continues on to look at renting in Australia and it is from here that the information presented starts to become increasingly relevant to property investors. There is also significant focus within the report looking at the different government support provided to property owners versus those who rent a home. The report states that support for residential property investors costs $6.8 billion a year,or about $4,500 per year for each investor household. If you want to skip to the really interesting part though I’d suggest heading straight to page 36 where the recommendations commence. There are three main recommendations looking at stamp duty and property tax, reform of tax incentives for property investment and also reform of the private rental sector.

Whilst I certainly don’t agree with all of the proposals there appears to be some strong evidence available to support the statements being put forward. What I have found interesting is the way that it has been portrayed in a range of media and particularly the comments that have been posted by readers. I’d be eager to hear people’s thoughts on this as it would have a significant impact on property investors should these recommendations be put into practice. Don’t be afraid to comment below! Click here to read the article.

You can also check out some of the following media articles, don’t forget to check the reader’s comments, it’s certainly stirred up some debate!

The Age property section – Domain

ABC News

The Herald Sun

Business Spectator

Your Investment Property Magazine

Company Title vs. Strata Title

When looking to purchase property it can sometimes feel like you have to start learning a new language and it’s not that far from the truth. There are a lot of terms that you need to learn about and start to understand what they mean. As frustrating as this can be, it’s crucial to make sure that you can speak at least some of the language of real estate to ensure that you have a good idea of what you’re getting in to and that you can avoid being bamboozled by agents talking the talk. One term that you will hear a lot, mainly when there are multiple dwellings in a group (units, apartments etc) is Strata Title. Another one that you may hear less often is Company Title. Let’s look at this fascinating unit recently for sale that highlights the difference between Strata and Company Title.

PP1

This one bedroom apartment recently listed (and already under offer) in Sydney’s beautiful Potts Point has been shut up for the last 20 years and has not been lived in for all of that time. 20 years ago similar units to this were selling for around $75,000, in 2013 however it’s priced at more than $436,000, not surprising at all when you can get views of the Opera House and Harbour Bridge from the common roof terrace! It’s certainly a unique offering which hit the news quickly and looks like it’s been snapped up just as quickly.

PP2

The interesting thing about this apartment though is that it’s listed as Company Title not the more common Strata Title. With strata title schemes they are divided into lots and common property. The feature of strata title is that each lot will come with it’s own title deed that can usually be bought, sold and mortgaged without any consent being needed from other lot owners or the building management. The owners also have an entitlement and relevant obligation for the use, maintenance and upkeep of the remaining common area outside of the individually owned lots (ie: driveways, paths, gardens, stairwells etc). Strata title was instigated by property developers in the 1960’s, prior to this, company title was a common method of ‘ownership’ in apartment and unit complexes.

A lot of company title complexes were set up in the 1920’s and 30’s and it’s not a surprise for the property above that was built in 1929. The difference with this title however is significant. Company title allows people to buy shares in the company that owns the building and the ownership of those shares allows the person to live in the unit. The large difference is that the purchaser will not receive any certificate of title for the property. There are also often restrictions on any subsequent leasing of the property and also the prospective owner may need to be approved by the company board of directors. Some lenders are also reluctant to lend as much for a company title property so it’s important to take this into consideration. If you hunt around there is a lot of useful information on the differences in property titles. This article gives a useful overview of the pros and cons related to company title. If you know of other useful resources, post them below!

China’s amazing ghost cities

ChinaOne of the most fascinating things that I’ve seen in the media recently regarding property development are the incredible ‘ghost cities’ that are being developed in China. The first I heard of this was in 2011 when Journalist Adrian Brown of the Australian Dateline program visited multiple new cities that had been built throughout China. The statistics are incredible with reports stating that there are over 64 million apartments vacant across the country. The background to why these cities have been built is intriguing and somewhat complicated. Many experts theorise that it has a lot to do with China’s tax policy. With no local property taxes, governments still need to make money so this is largely done through the development of land. With land sales being illegal in China this works by the government leasing large tracts of land for development of these massive estates, the scary thing is that this happens sometimes regardless of other services and infrastructure being there to support such large cities. Throw into this mix the emerging Chinese middle class with excellent savings records and a non-transparent stock market and investment in property is an attractive option for many, either as an investment for themselves or as a future home for a child. It’s reported that many people purchase their property with cash, and with no mortgage or property taxes to worry about it could be seen as a relatively easy investment to sit on. The results of this are evident however, just take some time and view the following footage, it’s astounding.

The first report is the original from 2011 whilst the second is a follow-up that was broadcast recently in 2013. The third report from 60 minutes Australia gives a slightly different view on the development of China from the perspective of an Australian architect employed to work on the redevelopment projects. The final clip from 60 minutes US is also really interesting. I find the entire thing absolutely amazing and I’m continuing to find more and more information regarding this unique situation an entire country finds itself in. I’ll be fascinated to see how this develops over the next 5, 10 or 20 years.

Looking around LA

I think I’d find it almost impossible to come to LA and be surrounded by so much real estate without getting out for a bit of a look. So today in sunny West Hollywood I consulted Google Maps and off I went. Whilst I would have loved to have gone up into the hills to stroll through mansions my lack of car (and multiple millions of dollars) kept me local. I selected 2 properties to view, one on the ‘If I won lotto list’ and the other was on the ‘this could be doable one day’ list. Let’s start with the home that would use up my lotto winnings.

Described as a Stunning 3 bed, 3.5 bath town home with superb finishes located near the famous and trendy Melrose Place, I’d certainly be thrilled to call this place home. At just under 1.5 million it’s not cheap, but for the location in West Hollywood and the amazing property I’d be thinking this is good value. Huge bedrooms, great bathrooms and a large outdoor area help finish off the 1 year old 2250sq foot 2 level condo.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Although the agent was assuring me that the US property market is well on the rebound I had the luxury of looking through this amazing property by myself for almost 45 minutes. I get the feeling that the level of confidence in the local property market may not be quite as positive as he indicated, or maybe all of the movie stars were off filming today. So I then packed up my bags and headed west to the other end of West Hollywood, literally the other side of the street to Beverley Hills.

This cute bungalow below is situated in an area known as the Norma Triangle and was built in 1922. This was the more realistic property I wanted to inspect, with 2 beds and 1 bath it is quoted at $787,000. OK, maybe not amazingly cheap but half the price of the previous one…and it comes with your own recording studio (formerly known as a garage). It had a completely different feel to the other property being much more homely. A fantastic hedge rose 10 feet as your front fence which appears very common in LA and looks great. There was also a nice backyard to relax in after your exhausting recording sessions. I’ve asked both of the agents to get back to me with what their rental estimates would be, I’ll be interested to see what percentage return you get.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I’d always recommend having a look at properties in other countries if you get a chance whilst travelling. I find it not only very useful to get an idea of what you can get for your money but also fascinating to see how others live!

Tip 3 – What do you want to achieve?

thinkingWhen considering investing in property it’s essential to think carefully about why you are doing it and why you are choosing to invest in property over any other options. There is a lot of media coverage in many countries about the process and benefits of property investing and it’s certainly encouraging to a lot of people, however there are many questions that you should be asking yourself before heading down that path. One of the things I talk to people a lot about is to be ‘cautiously receptive’ of other people’s advice (including mine as well) and when you start telling people that you are thinking about buying an investment property you’ll be surprised at how many people have an opinion on it and plenty of advice to go along with it.

Ultimately, you are the only one that can decide if it’s the right option for you and your circumstances and this requires every potential investor to hold up a mirror and ask themselves some questions. Here are a few prompts that I found (and still continue) to find useful when considering buying a property for investment.

  • What do I want to get out of investing in property? Am I approaching this as a long term investment that I’m happy to maintain for years to come, or am I dong this for some fast returns?
  • Am I aiming to establish a portfolio of properties or am I going to buy one property for investment? If I’m aiming for multiples, how do I do that?
  • Do I want my investments to eventually be my primary income? Am I aiming to have it as a ‘retirement fund’ or eventually extra spending money?
  • Will I be disappointed if it takes a long time for me to see some positive cash flow from my investment? What if it starts off losing money?
  • Examining my finances, am I in a position to invest in property…realistically? Have I been putting off investing because I think I may not be able to do it financially?
  • Do I want a ‘set and forget’ investment or am I prepared to put time and energy into my investments? I think this question is very important to be able to answer as property can end up being either of those things.
  • How much do I know about being a landlord and how much time am I prepared to put into the process of learning about it?
  • Am I realistic about how I would manage if something goes wrong? What about if my income drops, if my family circumstances change, if I need to pay for major repairs or if I have issues with a tenant?

These questions are just a starting point for things to think about and all before you have been to an open for inspection. Often the first thing people will do when thinking about property investment is to go looking at properties and quickly fall in love with their dream investment. My view is that this can often be the first mistake in a long line of potentially costly steps. Remember, this is an investment and you need to be clear about what you want to achieve before you find yourself signing a contract of sale! Yes, it’s not the exciting part but it is essential. Being clear about your goals through investment will be one of the best first steps you can take and will certainly help pave the way for a successful journey. Try not to be put off by it, sometimes it’s challenging to put the brakes on and ask yourself such questions and you also need to be prepared to deal with your answers. If you don’t like what the answers are then it means that you need to do some more work before you get out there buying a property. It’s entirely worth it though so persevere!

If you are starting to think about investing or already are, what are the questions that you would recommend? What have you found useful to consider? Add them below!